In the ever-evolving arena of global trade, few issues have sparked as much domestic debate — or international friction — as Canada’s supply management system. Once again at the centre of policy discussions and trade negotiations, supply management is being described not merely as an economic mechanism but as a symbol of national resilience. Former trade minister Ed Fast, reflecting on its enduring role in the Globe and Mail, likens it to a “Gordian Knot” — complex, often misjudged and politically charged. But, as Fast cautions, Canada’s response must not be to hastily sever the knot under pressure. Instead, he argues, we must grasp its deeper strategic value in a world where “free markets” are too often anything but fair.

The system ensures stable incomes for farmers and consistent prices for consumers by regulating food staples such as dairy, chicken, turkey and eggs. According to a recent report from RBC, these managed sectors contribute more than $30-billion to Canada’s GDP, and support 339,000 full-time jobs from the farm, to processing to distributing; and nearly 15,000 farms.

“At its core, the system provides a stable price that fairly compensates farmers for producing high-quality food. The system’s advocates say it boosts food security, supports domestic producers, and ensures consistency of quality and supply for consumers,” the RBC report, Supply Management Explained, says.

To protect domestic production, Canadian processors implement tariff rate quotas (TRQ) to limit imports within their supply-managed industries. Until 2017, foreign access to the TRQ was limited to commitments under the World Trade Organization. However, recent trade negotiations, such as CPTPP, CUSMA, and CETA, have gradually opened the door to greater foreign market access.

While these concessions aim to ease diplomatic tensions, they have created new friction by eroding domestic market shares. For instance, though concessions with the CPTPP were intended to provide an estimated 3.25% access to Canada’s dairy market, imports now represent roughly 4% of Canada’s dairy market. To offset lost profits, the federal government paid farmers and processors $4.8 billion.

Protecting farmers, preserving trade leverage

As Fast argues, supply management is one of the few economic tools Canada can leverage in an increasingly volatile trade environment. Following the re-election of U.S. President Donald Trump, and the return of his “America First, everyone else last” policy, it’s even more important now than ever.

According to Fast, Ottawa’s passage of Bill C-202, which prohibits the government from offering increased TRQ access in future trade negotiations, reflects Canada’s commitment to supply chain management — a “protective stance” which could present an opportunity.

“Dismantling supply management in this moment of geopolitical uncertainty and rising economic nationalism would miss a unique opportunity: the chance to leverage a persistent bilateral irritant to Canada’s advantage,” wrote Fast.

Should Canada remove TRQ on U.S. imports, the domestic market would likely flooded with heavily subsidized U.S. imports, leaving Canadian farmers struggling to compete. Instead, Fast argues supply management should be incorporated into wider strategic negotiations of a “grander bargain” with the U.S., encompassing agriculture, culture, and telecoms, and advancing new national priorities.

Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne has said Canada’s supply management system will not be part of ongoing trade negotiations with the U.S. “This is off the table,” Champagne told Bloomberg News.

Canadian innovation

Supply management can also offer pathways to Canadian innovation, with the example of dairy producer Agropur offering a “road map,” according to CEO Émile Cordeau. The company successfully modernized and expanded its operations by growing its business in Canada’s protected market, before expanding to competitive and open markets in the U.S.

Benefitting from the stability of a closed, supply-managed market allowed it to have the flexibility to balance risk with reward. During a time of heightened volatility of the U.S. market, Agropur’s model suggests Canada’s supply management system could offer investors a mix of risk and stability when used strategically.

“We’re going to protect supply management and we’re going to make sure it remains intact,” said Cordeau.”That is key for us to be able to invest in our assets, in our innovation, in our growth road map.”

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Rural Roundup